How to Use Assessments in Reading and Spelling (Formal and Informal Guide)

|

Why do we assess students?
What should we actually be looking for?
And how often should we be doing it?

If assessments have ever felt overwhelming or like something separate from teaching, this will help you simplify.

Many people think of assessments as tests. In structured literacy, assessing a student helps us tailor instruction rather than guessing.

  • what a student knows
  • what they’re still figuring out
  • and what to teach next

When I start with a new student, I almost always begin at the start of my scope and sequence, because gaps tend to show up quickly.

I’ve had students who could read passages but didn’t know that letters could make more than one sound. Once we slowed down and built that foundation, everything else moved faster.

I see this happen again and again. When I start with letter sounds and make sure the foundation is solid, students often have those “ah ha” moments. Then, when I introduce syllable types, their progress tends to move faster. In my experience, that sequence — letter sounds first, syllable types next — has the biggest impact on reading and spelling.

That doesn’t mean I skip assessments. In fact, they help confirm what I’m seeing and often show gaps sooner than expected.

When used well, assessments guide everything and make teaching more efficient.

They help:

  • identify strengths and gaps
  • adjust instruction
  • monitor progress
  • decide when to move on (or not)

Want an In-depth Video of this article? Link: https://bit.ly/44EWtgt

Assessments can have many uses, listed below. They are the foundation on where to start and the monitor of how far we’ve come with a student. They help us see a snapshot in time and tell us where to go next.

Identifying Specific Needs. Assessments help pinpoint a student’s strengths and weaknesses.

Guiding Instruction. Identifying specific areas of difficulty allows us to customize teaching strategies.

Monitoring Progress. Regular, ongoing assessments track a student’s progress over time.

Informing Intervention. Through early identification of difficulties, assessments help us intervene before things spiral. We can call this a “spiral review/assessment.”

Building Confidence. Students love to see their improvements. I like giving a checklist of skills students are learning and have them check off each skill as it’s mastered.

Evidence-Based Decision Making. Assessments give us measurements to go by, rather than us just saying the student improved. We can see improvement.

Collaboration and Communication. We can use the results to communicate with parents (or caregivers) and teachers at school about a student’s needs and progress in writing.

Assessments in reading and spelling look at multiple layers of skill. Some are foundational, and some show how those skills are applied.

These are the skills that most directly impact a student’s ability to read and spell.

Phonological and phonemic awareness is the ability to hear and work with sounds in spoken words — blending, segmenting, and manipulating sounds.

Phonics and the alphabetic principle is understanding that letters represent sounds and using that knowledge to read and spell.

Decoding is reading unfamiliar words by applying sound-symbol knowledge instead of guessing.

Encoding (spelling) is spelling words by hearing sounds and applying patterns and rules.

These show how well a student can use those foundational skills in connected text.

Fluency is how smoothly a student reads, including accuracy, rate, and expression.

Vocabulary is understanding word meanings both in isolation and in context.

Reading comprehension is making sense of what is read by recalling, interpreting, and thinking about the meaning.

These areas show how well a student can communicate and apply what they know beyond isolated words.

Writing is using spelling, sentence structure, and organization to express ideas clearly.

Oral language is understanding spoken language and expressing thoughts clearly when speaking.

The goal is to gather information without interrupting instruction. A consistent rhythm works best.

Before Instruction Begins. Before instruction begins, use an assessment to establish a baseline. This helps identify strengths, gaps, and where to begin.

Formative Assessments. Informal checks should happen regularly as part of teaching. These can be quick and built into lessons.

Progress Monitoring. More structured progress monitoring can happen every few weeks to track growth over time.

End-of-Term/Year Assessments. At the end of a term or teaching cycle, reassess using the same or similar measures to compare progress.

As Needed: If a student plateaus, regresses, or struggles with a new concept, assess that specific area to guide your next steps.

Adjust based on the student, and keep assessments efficient. They should support instruction, not take time away from it.

Informal assessments are often built right into your teaching. They might look like:

  • completing a worksheet
  • reading a passage
  • spelling words during dictation

You can revisit the same materials over time and look for growth.

Packets and structured materials can be especially useful here because they focus on specific skills and provide consistency.

Phonemic awareness. Ask students to break words into sounds or manipulate sounds.

Decoding. Use nonsense words or controlled word lists to see if they can apply patterns.

Sight word recognition. Use flashcards or lists to check automatic recognition.

Spelling. Dictate words and analyze errors to see what patterns are missing.

Reading. Have students read passages and discuss meaning to check comprehension.

This section contains links to informal assessments.

Formal Assessment #1: Gallistel-Ellis assessment. This one I can’t give away, but here is a link if you would like to explore further. https://amzn.to/3wh4Wt4

The Gallistel-Ellis Test of Coding Skills (GE Test) is an assessment tool used to evaluate coding skills in reading and spelling. Developed by cognitive psychologists Randy Gallistel and Ann Ellis, this test measures whether a student can give the sounds for various letters and units or clusters.

  • Comprehensive Measure: The GE Test covers all categories of phonic structures, including:
  • Closed syllables with single consonants
  • Blends and digraphs
  • Silent-E words
  • Soft C and G
  • Vowel teams and vowel-r
  • Suffixes and modifiers
  • Multi-syllable and irregular words
  • Non-Sense Syllables: Each test segment concludes with non-sense syllables, helping identify whether a student relies on sight memory or has truly “cracked the code.”
  • Easy Administration: In less than 20 minutes, teachers can determine which skills have been mastered and what needs further instruction.
  • Graphing System: A clear and easy-to-use graphing system helps teachers identify student strengths, weaknesses, and progress, which can be effectively communicated to parents.

Orton-Gillingham educators use a variety of formal assessments besides the Gallistel-Ellis Test. Note: I have only used the Gallistel-Ellis test.

  • Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ IV): This comprehensive set of assessments covers a wide range of reading, writing, and mathematical skills. It includes subtests for letter-word identification, reading fluency, passage comprehension, spelling, and writing skills, which are particularly relevant for dyslexic learners.
  • Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP-2): The CTOPP-2 assesses phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming. These areas are crucial for understanding a student’s reading abilities and potential difficulties with decoding.
  • Gray Oral Reading Tests (GORT-5): The GORT-5 is a widely used tool for measuring oral reading fluency and comprehension. It assesses the rate, accuracy, fluency, and comprehension of oral reading, providing valuable insights into both the mechanical and interpretive aspects of reading.
  • Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-III): This test assesses academic achievement in reading, writing, and math. The reading components evaluate decoding, reading comprehension, and reading fluency, making it a useful tool for identifying specific reading issues.
  • Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE-2): The TOWRE-2 is a norm-referenced, standardized test that measures an individual’s ability to pronounce printed words (Sight Word Efficiency) and phonemically decode nonsense words (Phonemic Decoding Efficiency) under timed conditions. It’s particularly useful for assessing reading fluency and decoding skills.

Assessments enable educators to make informed decisions, track progress, and adjust teaching strategies, ultimately facilitating a path to learning that helps our students progress and thrive.

If you’re looking for more structured practice like this, including assessments and other rule-based patterns, I include these in my Fast Track Course.

It’s designed to give you clear, organized materials that follow a logical scope and sequence, so you’re not guessing what to teach next.

You can find more informal assessment tools in Packets and Readers.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *